Talk Radio’s Disaster – Let’s Fix This. Who’s In?

 

Hey.  My feet are getting wet back here.

Hey. My feet are getting wet back here.

I now know people are worried about the future of talk radio.  The two blogs I wrote (Ratings Disaster) (Why Nothing Changes) about the format’s dismal June PPM Nielsen ratings went viral and I was contacted “off line” by numerous industry leaders.  One station group owner told me his stations can no longer sell the format to advertisers, due to a shrinking, old and extremist audience and the hosts that cater to this group.  His candor is something rarely heard.  A quick search of message boards, my emails and personal texts show people are concerned and see a bleak future if nothing changes. Corporate radio isn’t going to change it.  It’s obvious they don’t see a product worth reinventing and they have too much invested in the current genre of “conservative talk radio” to make a change. Innovation rarely comes from those comfortable with maintaining the status quo.

What I said previously on this blog wasn’t an epiphany.  It was simply observant.  Others are thinking it and that’s why it resonated.  That may be the teaching moment for talk hosts and programmers on the importance of content focused on the wants and needs important to listeners at any given point in time, not content a host or programmer decides is important.  No one dared say what I said, certainly not the radio industry press dependent on the latest and irrelevant “RIGHT this, RIGHT that” play-on-words display ads for conservative talk hosts. I don’t fault them.  We all have to make money to pay the bills and that will normally muzzle people.

Seanisright

Hannity a “conservative?” Really? Didn’t know that!

Even format mouthpiece Michael Harrison, publisher of Talkers Magazine and Talkers.com, has started to chime in.

Quoted from the Boston Herald and understanding he was speaking with the Herald’s Internet station at the time, Boston Herald Radio, Harrison’s opinions are revealing.

 

The authority on all things 
radio — Talkers magazine publisher Michael Harrison — said the future of Boston talk radio “troubles” him and he hopes it can be revived by Internet radio clicking with listeners.

He hopes Boston talk radio can be revived through Internet radio. Granted he was speaking with an Internet radio station at the time, but since two terrestrial talk stations raised the white flag in Bean-town because of bad business in the previous few years, he’s searching for change to come from anywhere. He knows it won’t come from the consolidated radio companies.

 

“The future could be bright if people tap into the 
potential of the audience,” he said.

Potential audience.  This means a larger, broader and younger audience.  Is there a place for right wing conservative talk radio?  Sure, but only as one menu item in a larger selection of the spoken word format.

 

That said, Harrison said the 
future of talk radio is bright if the people who run the “big-time radio stations are able to really create diverse and important programming that people need” because “it’s become a very noisy world” in the Internet age.

“Create diverse and important programming that people (important word here) “NEED!”  Focusing on the needs of the audience isn’t revolutionary thought, but it is something so many self important talk hosts and programmers forget.  Speak about the consumer’s daily concerns, their lives and advocate for them.  We must speak to more than just one group of conspiratorial, angry, 65 plus white guys. That narrative, over and over, is old, boring, lacks engagement, is irrelevant and worst of all, is no longer believable in the real world.

 

A very well known industry executive contacted me and told me my thoughts were dead on.  My response was, “So what are we going to do about it?”

I didn’t carve out a career in radio programming by being able to identify the problem and not fix it. Change is inevitable, as is increasing competition and new technologies, but I’ll be damned if I’m going to let the radio industry crumble around me because of radio’s collective inaction and “What Me Worry” attitude without putting up a fight.  I have way too many years invested in this.

Let’s fix this.  So who’s in?

Don’t be afraid of the future.  There’s a 100% chance of failure if we do nothing.  The odds are much better if we dare to imagine and take a chance.

I’m looking forward to hearing from you.  Confidentially of course.  darryl@darrylparksmedia.com

Coming soon.  The game plan to fix talk radio.

 

Please like and share this blog.  

Get more insight and thoughts in 140 characters on Twitter by following me @darryl_parks

  2 comments for “Talk Radio’s Disaster – Let’s Fix This. Who’s In?

  1. Michael Vinnedge
    July 24, 2014 at 11:32 pm

    Darryl we spoke briefly about this before I think they need to start by getting rid of the public service commercials that make people look and sound like idiots. I started turning the radio off when these ridiculous commercials came on and then finally stopped listening all together. I use to enjoy talk radio but when a 1 hour show consists if 25 minutes of bullshi* commercials do you really blame people for not listening ?

  2. Hans von Balkovsky
    July 27, 2014 at 6:05 pm

    Your problems is with “anger” or merely the demographic demonstrating anger? The anger will go on
    cross-demographic.

    Is the 25-35 demographic going to be less angry or merely angry about something different-like the loss of the
    American dream, housing starts off again btw……

    It’s the cheerleading for unwinnable immoral wars which brought right wing talk radio to its knees
    the past decade.

    The Hannity-Cunningham-Levin-Brian Thomas boys club lies for Israel at its beck and call. You don’t win
    Marconi awards giving the Palestinian or the stay out of Iraq side, do you Willie? Nor get invited to hobnob with the Mark Levins of the collapsing media elite.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/israelgaza-conflict-the-secret-report-that-helps-israelis-to-hide-facts-9630765.html

    “The study admits that the Israeli government does not really want a two-state solution, but says this should be masked because 78 per cent of Americans do. Hopes for the economic betterment of Palestinians should be emphasized. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is quoted with approval for saying that it is “time for someone to ask Hamas: what exactly are YOU doing to bring prosperity to your people”. The hypocrisy of this beggars belief: it is the seven-year-old Israeli economic siege that has reduced the Gaza to poverty and misery.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: